Farmland India
P11 ยท Taxation, Stamp Duty & Registration ยท All India

Cash in Land Deals: Sections 269SS, 269ST and 271D/271E Explained (2026)

Know the cash limits for land advances, sale money and refunds, the penalties for crossing them, and the new section numbers under the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Farmland India Reviewed ยท Updated November 2026 ยท Official sources linked below

Income-tax law bars a seller from accepting Rs 20,000 or more in cash as an advance or other sum connected with a land transfer, and bars anyone from receiving Rs 2 lakh or more in cash in one transaction. Breaking either rule can attract a penalty equal to the full amount. From 1 April 2026 these rules sit in sections 185, 186 and 188 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, with penalties in sections 450, 451 and 453, replacing sections 269SS, 269ST, 269T, 271D, 271DA and 271E of the 1961 Act. For land buyers and sellers, this decides how every token, balance and refund should move.

At a glance

The money limits did not change when the new Act took effect; the section numbers did.

ItemDetailSource
Land advances and other "specified sums"Cash below Rs 20,000 only (counting unpaid earlier sums from the same person)s.269SS (1961); s.185 (2025)
General cash receiptsBelow Rs 2 lakh per day from one person, per transaction, or per events.269ST (1961); s.186 (2025)
Repaying advancesCash below Rs 20,000 onlys.269T (1961); s.188 (2025)
PenaltyEqual to the amount taken, received or repaid in breach, imposed by the Assessing Officers.271D, 271DA, 271E (1961); s.450, 451, 453 (2025)
New Act in force1 April 2026CBDT press release

Old and new section numbers

The Income-tax Act, 2025 received Presidential assent on 21 August 2025 and came into force on 1 April 2026, replacing the Income-tax Act, 1961, according to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). The Income-tax Rules, 2026 were notified on 20 March 2026. The Income Tax Department's section pages for the 2025 Act show:

  • Section 185: mode of taking or accepting certain loans, deposits and specified sum (old 269SS).
  • Section 186: the Rs 2 lakh cash receipt rule (old 269ST).
  • Section 188: repayment of loans, deposits and specified advances (old 269T).
  • Sections 450, 451 and 453: penalties for breaking sections 185, 186 and 188 (old 271D, 271DA and 271E).

Court orders and circulars still use the 1961 numbers, and a deal done before 1 April 2026 may still be examined under the 1961 Act. We could not confirm the transitional wording for a given earlier year; check with a chartered accountant if a notice refers to one.

The Rs 20,000 rule for land advances

The Finance Act, 2015 substituted section 269SS with effect from 1 June 2015 so that it covers a "specified sum" as well as loans and deposits. This is money receivable, as an advance or otherwise, in relation to the transfer of immovable property (the Act's words), whether or not the transfer takes place. A token amount, often called bayana (เคฌเคฏเคพเคจเคพ), or earnest money on a land deal is caught.

The rule applies when the sum being accepted, the unpaid earlier sums from the same person, or the two together reach Rs 20,000 or more. Such sums must come by account payee cheque, account payee bank draft, electronic clearing through a bank account, or a prescribed electronic mode. Rule 6ABBA of the 1961 Rules listed credit card, debit card, net banking, IMPS, UPI, RTGS, NEFT and BHIM Aadhaar Pay. We could not confirm the matching rule in the Income-tax Rules, 2026.

The rule does not apply to money taken from or by the Government, banks, post office savings banks, co-operative banks, statutory corporations, Government companies or notified institutions. One exception matters in farm deals: it does not apply where both parties have agricultural income and neither has income chargeable to tax. Whether a buyer and seller fit this depends on their full tax position; confirm it with a tax adviser.

!

Splitting does not help

The limit counts earlier unpaid sums from the same person. Several small cash tokens that together reach Rs 20,000 fall within the rule.

The Rs 2 lakh receipt rule

Section 269ST, inserted by the Finance Act, 2017 and now section 186, applies to anyone receiving money. No one may receive Rs 2 lakh or more other than by account payee cheque, account payee draft, electronic clearing or a prescribed electronic mode, where the amount is received from one person in a day, in respect of a single transaction, or for transactions relating to one event or occasion from a person.

Receipts by the Government and banks are excluded, as are transactions covered by section 269SS (now 185) and any receipts the Central Government notifies. CBDT Circular No. 22/2017 of 3 July 2017 clarified that each instalment of a loan repaid to a finance company is a single transaction; it did not deal with land sales.

For land, the overlap is the balance price paid at registration. Tribunals have differed on whether this is a "specified sum" under section 269SS or a receipt under section 269ST. Either way, cash above the threshold exposes the receiver to a penalty equal to the amount.

Refunds and penalties

When a deal falls through, section 269T (now 188) applies to the person repaying. A "specified advance" of Rs 20,000 or more connected with a land transfer must be refunded by account payee cheque, draft, electronic clearing or a prescribed electronic mode. This also took effect from 1 June 2015.

  • Section 271D, now 450: penalty equal to the loan, deposit or specified sum accepted in breach of the Rs 20,000 rule.
  • Section 271DA, now 451: penalty equal to the sum received in breach of the Rs 2 lakh rule. The 1961 text spared a person who proved good and sufficient reasons.
  • Section 271E, now 453: penalty equal to the amount repaid in breach of the repayment rule.

Under the 1961 Act, a proviso moved these penalties from the Joint Commissioner to the Assessing Officer for penalties imposed on or after 1 April 2025, and the 2025 Act names the Assessing Officer. Section 273B of the 1961 Act let a person avoid the 271D and 271E penalty by proving reasonable cause; we could not confirm its 2025 Act equivalent.

The penalty falls on the receiver or the repayer. A buyer who pays cash is not off the hook: the buyer must still explain the source of the money, and cash leaves a weak record of payment.

Stamp duty value and payment mode

Under section 50C of the 1961 Act, if the sale price of land is lower than the stamp valuation authority's value, the stamp value is treated as the seller's sale consideration. Where the agreement and registration dates differ, the stamp value on the agreement date may be used only if some of the price was received on or before that date by a non-cash mode. A cash token does not qualify. A tolerance band also applies; check the percentage for your year. We have not mapped section 50C to the 2025 Act here.

For duty rates see stamp duty and registration charges by state, and for tax deducted by the buyer on certain purchases see TDS under section 194-IA.

What to check before you pay or accept money

  • Pay the token and balance from your own bank account to the recorded owner's account, and record each payment's mode and reference in the agreement and the sale deed.
  • A seller or agent asking for a large cash token "to hold the deal" is asking for a transaction that can attract a penalty and weakens your evidence.
  • A deed value far below the real price, with the gap in cash, creates tax exposure for both sides.
  • If a deal is cancelled, insist on a bank refund to the original account.
  • Confirm the seller's title before paying anything; see our land due diligence checklist and land registration process.
  • If cash above these limits has already changed hands, speak to a chartered accountant or tax advocate. This guide explains the rules; it does not assess any individual case.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much cash can a seller accept as a token for land?
Less than Rs 20,000, counting earlier unpaid sums from the same person. Larger amounts must come through a bank or prescribed electronic mode.
Has section 269SS been replaced?
Yes. From 1 April 2026 the Rs 20,000 rule is in section 185 of the Income-tax Act, 2025.
What is the new section number for 269ST?
Section 186 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. Its penalty is in section 451, replacing section 271DA.
What is the penalty for accepting a cash advance above the limit?
A penalty equal to the amount accepted, under section 271D of the 1961 Act or section 450 of the 2025 Act.
Does the rule apply if the sale never happens?
Yes. A specified sum is covered whether or not the transfer takes place.
Can a seller refund an advance in cash?
Not if it is Rs 20,000 or more. Section 269T, now 188, requires a non-cash refund, and section 271E, now 453, sets a penalty equal to the amount repaid.
Is UPI an allowed mode?
Rule 6ABBA of the 1961 Rules listed UPI with NEFT, RTGS, IMPS, net banking, cards and BHIM Aadhaar Pay. Check the Income-tax Rules, 2026 for the current list.
Is there an exception for farmers?
The Rs 20,000 rule does not apply where both parties have agricultural income and neither has income chargeable to tax. A tax adviser should confirm whether this fits your case.
Who pays the penalty, buyer or seller?
The person who accepts or receives the cash, or who repays in cash. The buyer must still explain the source of any cash paid.
Does paying cash affect stamp duty value rules?
Yes. Section 50C lets the agreement-date stamp value be used only if part of the price was paid by a non-cash mode on or before that date.

Sources

Related reading

Jantri Rate Gujarat 2026: How to Check on GARVI
P11 Taxation, Stamp Duty & Registration

Jantri Rate Gujarat 2026: How to Check on GARVI

What Gujarat's jantri is, the 2023 doubling and pending revision, how to look it up on GARVI, and how agricultural and NA land are valued.

7 min read5 Nov 2026
โ† All P11 Taxation, Stamp Duty & Registration guides

Farmland India ("the Platform"), operated by Bulk Procure Private Limited, is a digital marketplace for listing agricultural land, farmhouse and plotted development projects. The Platform is not a real estate broker, agent or intermediary under RERA or any other applicable law, and does not act for either party to a transaction.

Listings are submitted by developers, owners and their authorised representatives. Before publication, the Platform carries out a documentary review of the material supplied and records what was sighted. That review is limited to the documents made available to us at that time. It is not a title investigation, not a legal opinion, and not a warranty of title, approvals, or the accuracy of any information supplied by a lister. The Trust Score is an internal assessment produced from that review and is intended as a research aid, not as a guarantee of outcome.

Every buyer must carry out independent due diligence before any transaction โ€” including verification of land records, encumbrance searches, approvals and regulatory compliance โ€” through their own advocate and chartered accountant. Any legal or advisory professional introduced through the Platform is engaged directly by the user, on that professional's own terms; the Platform does not employ, supervise or accept responsibility for their work.

Nothing on the Platform is investment advice. Land values can fall as well as rise. The Platform is not liable for any loss, dispute or damage arising from a transaction between parties.